<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Guild Media &#187; criticism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://guildmedia.net/tag/criticism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://guildmedia.net</link>
	<description>How the Web Was Won - Comentaries and a smattering of tech nerdiness. &#60;br /&#62; Web Design Development Programming, SEO, Internet Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 09:44:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Intenet Censorship vs Free Internet</title>
		<link>http://guildmedia.net/2009/07/17/intenet-censorship-vs-free-internet/</link>
		<comments>http://guildmedia.net/2009/07/17/intenet-censorship-vs-free-internet/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Matrix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[censordyne]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[corporate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[criticism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[debate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[democratic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filtering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[goverment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guildmedia.net/?p=226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The push is on to censor and filter the internet by governments and business with vested interests.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have the good fortune to have a number of interesting clients who are often writing about bleeding edge topics, especially in the realms of digital media, marketing and communication.</p>
<p><a title="SMLXL - Engagement Marketing and Communication principles from Alan Moore" rel="nofollow" href="http://smlxtralarge.com" target="_blank">Alan Moore, a mobile and engagement marketing expert</a> is currently writing a new book, &#8220;No Straight Lines&#8221;. I&#8217;ve been privileged to have a read of one his drafts. There were a number of points he raised in his writing that I found very topical with regards to recent media stories.</p>
<p>&#8220;<em>In Audience Atomization Overcome Rosen writes In the age of mass media, the press was able to define the sphere of legitimate debate with relative ease because the people on the receiving end were atomized connected &#8220;up&#8221; to Big Media but not across to each other. And now that authority is eroding.</em></p>
<p><em>This ability to connect, to go round, over, under and through what were for years barriers to information are the means by which we challenge the authority of mainstream media.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>But the push is on to stop this, as <a href="http://opennet.net/about-filtering">Opennet.net</a> sets out to show by listing all of the available internet filtering techniques and which countries are currently using them. It would appear the trend is on the rise.</p>
<p>Australia is currently the test case, and all other &#8220;democratic&#8221; Western countries are watching with interest. Governments have a tendency to copy each others legislation, especially if one sets a precedent.</p>
<p><object width="480" height="295" data="http://www.youtube.com/v/THe3FDe-aD4&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0x006699&amp;color2=0x54abd6" type="application/x-shockwave-flash"><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/THe3FDe-aD4&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;rel=0&amp;color1=0x006699&amp;color2=0x54abd6" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /></object></p>
<p><em>&#8230;election rigging? No, finding out about it.</em></p>
<p>The above <a title="Internet Censorship" rel="nofollow" href="http://censordyne.com.au/">CensorDyne advert</a> from <a title="GetUp is an independent, grass-roots community advocacy organisation " rel="nofollow" href="http://getup.org.au">GetUp!, a non-partisan lobby group</a>, was created with the intent that it would be aired where possible in Australia to try to get their message across to Australian legislators. One of the aims of the CensorDyne campaign was to have the advertisement aired on every Qantas flight. However this week <a title="political interference in GetUp ban: Qantas?" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.australianit.news.com.au/story/0,24897,25781616-15306,00.html">Qantas refused to run the CensorDyne</a> ad claiming they have a policy of not airing political material. However this response has been called into doubt as the airline has perviously air political satire. But most telling of all, David Epstein, a Qantas executive with close links to Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has dismissed suggestions that he personally barred an anti-internet censorship advertisement from airing on flights to Canberra.</p>
<p>These same &#8220;democratic&#8221; governments who have long been critical of the likes of Chinese Net censorship, are the very same governments who are looking at the very same technology for their own use, and in some instances, purchasing that same technology (software).</p>
<p>It is true what you say. This new networked world is very empowering, and that is precisely what <a title="File sharing" href="http://guildmedia.net/2009/04/20/file-sharing-not-sunk-yet-after-pirate-bay-loses-legal-case/">the &#8220;establishment&#8221; do not want</a> &#8211; a very public forum of <a href="http://guildmedia.net/2009/03/10/from-engagement-to-interruption/">discussion, debate, criticism, parody and outing is not welcome</a>.</p>
<p>And that establishment is the <a href="http://guildmedia.net/2009/02/23/retarded-internet-censorship-laws-in-new-zealand/">corporates who pull the strings of government</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;<em>Funny that, and of course we had the whole ‘cash for questions&#8217; issue in the UK, and then recently four Lords again using their influence, so it is claimed, to change legislation to the benefit of companies in exchange for large amounts of cash.</em>&#8221;</p>
<p>What we face is similar to the great American land rush of the 1800&#8217;s. People streamed Westwards to claim their bit of turf, at the expense of those already there (digital natives) and set up their own little &#8220;utopias&#8221;, hence the Wild West. And indeed many times I have read the internet equated with this.</p>
<p>But it was not too long before &#8220;authority&#8221; and regulation caught up with everyone, and that being because big business interests moved in &#8211; Ranchers, Railroads, Mining.</p>
<p>Question is, will WE manage to establish some sort of Digital Constitution, or Bill of Rights to our own data before we are filtered or locked out?</p>
<p>Or rather the question is, will WE take the time to properly inform and educate ourselves about this technology that we use?</p>
<p>While perhaps we despise malware authors and others out to steal our bank account details, defraud us and cause general selfish havoc, and provide the &#8220;establishment&#8221; further excuses to lock the Net (mobile or static), these malicious persons are actually forcing people not to take their data for granted.</p>
<p>But there remains that question. Will people be lazy, and not take personal responsibility and run to the open arms of the &#8220;establishment&#8221; for protection from the internet nasties, or will make the effort to become better educated?</p>
<!-- Social Bookmarks BEGIN -->
<div class="social_bookmark">
<a title="Click me to see the sites." href="#" onclick="$$('div.d226').each( function(e) { e.visualEffect('slide_down',{duration:2.5}) }); return false;"><strong><em>Bookmark to:</em></strong></a>
<br />
<div class="d226" style="overflow:hidden">
<br />
<br />
<a style="font-size:90%;text-align: right; " title="Click me to hide the sites." href="#" onclick="$$('div.d226').each( function(e) { e.visualEffect('slide_up',{duration:0.5}) }); return false;">Hide Sites</a>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Social Bookmarks END -->
<script type="text/javascript">$$('div.d226').each( function(e) { e.visualEffect('slide_up',{duration:0.5}) }); </script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://guildmedia.net/2009/07/17/intenet-censorship-vs-free-internet/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
