<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Guild Media &#187; legal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://guildmedia.net/tag/legal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://guildmedia.net</link>
	<description>How the Web Was Won - Comentaries and a smattering of tech nerdiness. &#60;br /&#62; Web Design Development Programming, SEO, Internet Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 09:44:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>File Sharing Not Sunk Yet After Pirate Bay Loses Legal Case</title>
		<link>http://guildmedia.net/2009/04/20/file-sharing-not-sunk-yet-after-pirate-bay-loses-legal-case/</link>
		<comments>http://guildmedia.net/2009/04/20/file-sharing-not-sunk-yet-after-pirate-bay-loses-legal-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:56:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[File Sharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anonymous VPS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPredatro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pirate Bay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tribler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[website]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guildmedia.net/?p=208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The famous and infamous Pirate Bay has recently lost its legal battle in which the site's owners are accused of aiding and abetting copyright infringement.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The famous and infamous <a title="Torrents, File Sharing Website" rel="nofollow" href="http://thepiratebay.org/">Pirate Bay</a> has recently lost its legal battle in which the site&#8217;s owners are accused of aiding and abetting copyright infringement. However Peter Sunde, Fredrik Neij, Gottfrid Svartholm and Carl Lundström who were found guilty and sentenced to one year in prison and payment of a fine of 30 million SEK (app. $3,620,000 USD), after a trial of 9 days, will appeal against the verdict. The website to date has been unaffected and remains online.</p>
<p>The Pirate Bay verdict appears to be achieving the    opposite to the outcome intended by the copyright advocates with support for    the site and its political offshoot, the Pirate Party reportedly going from    strength to strength.</p>
<p>Future victories for copyright holders are looking    increasingly shaky as Bittorrent tracking sites such as The Pirate Bay are    about to be replaced by applications such as the <a rel="nofollow" href="http://www.tribler.org/">Tribler</a> which uses no centralized server, making it harder for authorities to track and prosecutions be braught against any one body of focus. Anonymous VPS services such as <a rel="nofollow" href="http://ipredator.se/">iPredator</a>, will also offers file sharers protection. So its an ongoing arms race.</p>
<div id="attachment_210" class="wp-caption aligncenter" style="width: 490px"><a href="http://guildmedia.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/thepiratebaycartoon-small.png"><img class="size-large wp-image-210" title="thepiratebaycartoon-small" src="http://guildmedia.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/thepiratebaycartoon-small-626x1024.png" alt="Piracy" width="480" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Piracy</p></div>
<!-- Social Bookmarks BEGIN -->
<div class="social_bookmark">
<a title="Click me to see the sites." href="#" onclick="$$('div.d208').each( function(e) { e.visualEffect('slide_down',{duration:2.5}) }); return false;"><strong><em>Bookmark to:</em></strong></a>
<br />
<div class="d208" style="overflow:hidden">
<br />
<br />
<a style="font-size:90%;text-align: right; " title="Click me to hide the sites." href="#" onclick="$$('div.d208').each( function(e) { e.visualEffect('slide_up',{duration:0.5}) }); return false;">Hide Sites</a>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Social Bookmarks END -->
<script type="text/javascript">$$('div.d208').each( function(e) { e.visualEffect('slide_up',{duration:0.5}) }); </script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://guildmedia.net/2009/04/20/file-sharing-not-sunk-yet-after-pirate-bay-loses-legal-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2Clix Drops Legal Case</title>
		<link>http://guildmedia.net/2007/09/20/2clix-drops-legal-case/</link>
		<comments>http://guildmedia.net/2007/09/20/2clix-drops-legal-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2007 09:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Leo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Censorship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[legal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public relations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://guildmedia.net/news/2007/09/20/2clix-drops-legal-case/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[2Clix has withdrawn from a legal case against the founder broadband discussion forum Whirlpool.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>
2Clix has withdrawn from a legal case against the founder broadband discussion forum Whirlpool. But it is not necessarily all is well that ends well. The legal question still hangs over Australian public forums as to who takes the legal responsibility for publically posted comments. This grey area still exists in the Australian laws.
</p>
<p>
Ever since news of 2Clix&#39;s legal action against Whirlpool founder Simon Wright first broke, the general opinion has been that it was, at best, a massive miscalculation. 2Clix&#39;s suit, which sought to have two threads discussing the effectiveness of its products removed from the site, instead resulted in global publicity of those threads. Those threads still currently dominate the top five search results for &#39;2Clix&#39; on Google, hardly a good outcome if you&#39;re seeking to minimise bad publicity.&nbsp;
</p>
<p>
Companies that engage in such legal action against negative discussions need to also think about the flip side of the coin. If they can demand that negative comments should be taken down, then what if all of the positive comments go with them.</p>
<!-- Social Bookmarks BEGIN -->
<div class="social_bookmark">
<a title="Click me to see the sites." href="#" onclick="$$('div.d75').each( function(e) { e.visualEffect('slide_down',{duration:2.5}) }); return false;"><strong><em>Bookmark to:</em></strong></a>
<br />
<div class="d75" style="overflow:hidden">
<br />
<br />
<a style="font-size:90%;text-align: right; " title="Click me to hide the sites." href="#" onclick="$$('div.d75').each( function(e) { e.visualEffect('slide_up',{duration:0.5}) }); return false;">Hide Sites</a>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Social Bookmarks END -->
<script type="text/javascript">$$('div.d75').each( function(e) { e.visualEffect('slide_up',{duration:0.5}) }); </script>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://guildmedia.net/2007/09/20/2clix-drops-legal-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
